{"id":2026,"date":"2020-07-05T19:50:57","date_gmt":"2020-07-05T23:50:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/asplos-conference.org\/?page_id=2026"},"modified":"2020-07-05T19:50:57","modified_gmt":"2020-07-05T23:50:57","slug":"extended-abstracts","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/asplos-conference.org\/extended-abstracts\/","title":{"rendered":"Extended Abstracts"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

ASPLOS’21 Extended Abstracts<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In the past decade, our community has grown considerably both in the number of researchers and the number of institutions involved. While this is a wonderful development for our field, the corresponding growth in conference submissions is stressing our paper review processes. The increasingly larger program committees (PC) and multi-day PC meetings have not been sufficient to address the problems. PC members complain about excessive reviewing workloads and long PC meetings where they rarely talk. Authors routinely complain about low quality of reviews and inconsistent review outcomes. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

We believe the key to high quality review outcomes and an overall high quality program is to involve more PC members with the review and decision for each paper. To allow for that in the presence of record submission counts (almost 500 for ASPLOS\u201920), we will pilot the use of extended abstracts<\/em> in ASPLOS\u201921.\u00a0 Each paper submission must be accompanied by a 2-page extended abstract that summarizes the motivation, key insights, main artifacts, and important contributions (see this template<\/a> for suggested structure). The extended abstracts are inspired by the familiar submission format for the yearly IEEE Micro Top Picks<\/a> issue.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here is how extended abstracts will help in the reviewing process:<\/p>\n\n\n\n